LIFT, DRAG, AND FLAPS (AOPA)

A place to relax and discuss flying topics.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21291
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

LIFT, DRAG, AND FLAPS (AOPA)

Post by GAHorn »

The latest AOPA e-newsletter contains:
"LIFT, DRAG, AND FLAPS
Flaps increase a wing's lift and drag. The increased lift allows flight at lower airspeeds, and the increased drag permits steeper approaches. But that's not the whole story. Lift and drag team up differently at different flap settings. Understanding how they vary is necessary to know what kind of performance to expect from your aircraft. The changing influence of lift and drag as flap deployment changes also explains why the immediate partial retraction of flaps is required during go-arounds after a full-flap approach in many aircraft.

"Flaps represent a way to increase the approach angle because the lift generated by flaps is accompanied by an increase in drag. Although it varies with the exact type of flap (Fowler, slotted, unslotted, simple hinged), it is generally assumed that as flaps are extended past 15 degrees, they begin generating more drag than lift," wrote Budd Davisson in the February 2008 AOPA Flight Training feature "Controlling your approach path: Drop flaps or slip the ship." http://www.aopa.org/epilot/redir.cfm?adid=14278


The acceleration-inhibiting drag prevalent in intermediate to full flap deployments is the reason that go-arounds may require immediate flap reductions. "In a balked landing (go-around) climb, the wing flap setting should be reduced to 20 degrees immediately after full power is applied. Upon reaching a safe airspeed, the flaps should be slowly retracted to the full up position," says the pilot's operating handbook (POH) for a 1980 Cessna 152, a trainer with flap settings of 10, 20, and 30 degrees. (Note that it is the lift provided by the first flap setting that enables the Cessna 152 to make better short-field and soft-field takeoffs with one "notch" of flaps extended.)

In flight, understanding the performance and control implications of flap settings helps a pilot to choose among the options available when facing a given set of runway and wind conditions, as discussed by Alton K. Marsh in the August 2004 AOPA Pilot feature "The flap about flaps." http://www.aopa.org/members/files/pilot ... s0408.html Always observe the airspeed limitations on the use of flaps as depicted on the white arc of your aircraft's airspeed indicator and as noted in the POH. Also note any cautions in the POH about combining slips [see the Feb. 24, 2006, Training Tips] with flaps. http://www.aopa.org/epilot/redir.cfm?adid=14279

The right amount of flap extension, at the right time, will give you the best performance."
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
cessna170bdriver
Posts: 4114
Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:13 pm

Post by cessna170bdriver »

Good info, George. However, "immediate" flap reduction in a go-around in an airplane with electric (slow) flaps is one thing; dumping 20 degrees of manual flap in a 170 is quite another. While you don't want to dawdle in a flaps-40 go-around situation, you shouldn't reduce the flap setting any faster than would happen with electric flaps, IMHO. If you immediately dump from 40 degrees to 20 before the airplane has a little time to accelerate, you're going to get a sinking feeling.

Miles
Miles

“I envy no man that knows more than myself, but pity them that know less.”
— Thomas Browne
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21291
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Post by GAHorn »

Technique has a lot to do about it. In theory, there's no reason one cannot "dump" flaps.... as long as the appropriate angle-of-attack (pitch up) is also adopted just as quickly.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
Post Reply
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.