Posted: Tue Jan 11, 2005 5:08 am
George,
Forum: 1. the public square or market place of an ancient Roman city or town, where legal and political business was conducted. 2. a law court; tribunal. 3. an assembly for the discussion of public matters or current questions.
Pontificate: 1. to officiate as a pontiff 2. to behave in the manner of a pontiff; be dogmatic
I stand by my previous post. Smiley face or no.
George, what you suggest as widely accepted means to pre-heat aren't as effective in the Arctic as they may be in Texas. The method you describe is not widely accepted, nor is it necessarily good operating practice, nor will it actually work in truly "cold" temperatures. Could you please offer the reference which suggests that this is good operating practice, please? I for one, have spent a lot of time perusing annals of arctic operations, and I've never actually seen mention of what you describe. Reference, please?
The problem with putting a heater outside the cowling is that heaters are simply designed to elevate the temperature of incoming air, and to eject warmer air. If the outside air temp is really cold, your method may not adequately heat the engine, because the heater will be drawing in really cold air and turning it into merely cool air, not actually warm enough to adequately heat the engine.
To properly heat an engine with a fan forced heater in cold, as opposed to cool, temperatures, you need to put the heater inside the cowling. This permits the air to recirculate within the cowling, and be heated and re-heated repeatedly. Do that with a fan forced heater, and you risk fire. That is a fact, though it doesn't happen bery often.
And, of course, it requires an engine blanket of some kind as well, which you noted.
If what you are doing is trying to take an engine from an ambient temperature of +20 degrees (or +15, or ???) to +50, your technique will work fine, and may in fact be a great way to pre-heat. But, what if you take the airplane on the road? You have to now carry not only the heater, the engine cover, an extension cord, and the cobbled up stovepipe, all inside the airplane.
See http://www.tanisaircraft.com for a pretty good discussion of pre-heating, which, by the way, doesn't particularly agree with your assertions either, regarding cylinder heat. Apparently, I'm not the only one.
And, it gets cold where they live, too, by the way. I'd commend anyone thinking of pre-heating to go there and read their comments. Now, understand that they sell engine heaters, so their assertions against the competition may be slanted a bit, but this is a great general discussion of pre-heating engines.
Both the Tanis and the Reiff heat systems have some engineering and testing behind them, they have no moving parts, and the likelihood of lighting your airplane on fire with one is really, really low. And, I would point out that they have tested their oil sump heat pads on engine oil pans in warm tempertures as well. Minnessota can get pretty warm in the summer. In fact, as a side note, I've flown up here in +103 degree temperatures, on floats (as in it doesn't get much worse than that), with no oil temperature problems at all, WITH an oil pan heater installed. Imagine that.
George, your original comments regarding the Tanis system are incorrect. Tanis uses a much more comprehensive approach than you let on in your post. It is a good system, and so is the Reiff system. Again, see the Tanis web site for a full description of their product. It is truly a "system".
If you live, fly and work in cold country, as I do, your method won't work. A lot of folks use fan forced heaters up here, and have good luck with them, but they put them inside the cowling, with a tightly closed cowl cover installed. Personally, I don't like the fire risk associated with these little furnaces, but they work for many many hours without trouble, and a lot of people use them, but not the way you advocate.
I prefer the installed systems, and I have a plug built into the side of my airplane (I know: MY HEAVENS!!! Stressed skin!!!). When I get somewhere with power, all I have to do is put on the engine cover, plug my extension cord into power, and into the side of the cowling of the airplane. The plug on the cowling is also equipped with a small red lamp on the outside of the cowl, so I can drive or walk by in the night and verify that the electricity is on, and the engine is getting heat. That is a comforting feeling when you are parked on the ramp in Fort Yukon for a week at a time, working in -20 or colder temperatures, or worse. I have used a Tanis pre-heat system at least once when the ambient temperature was -58. After having been plugged in all night, the engine compartment (as in all parts of it, including the firewall) was warm to the touch, and ready to go (I don't advocate flying in those temps, but that was a medevac flight, and going to warmer temps).
I have no problem with your methodology at all, for the conditions that you face, and if the only place you ever pre-heat is at home.
Now, if you have to pre-heat where there is no electricity, follow Mit Greb's suggestions in an earlier post.
Forum: 3. an assembly for the discussion of public matters or current questions.
So, for what its worth, which may not be much, especially if you live in south Florida.
Fairbanks is forecasted to hit -50 tonight, currently -36 F. No flying tomorrow.
Mike Vivion
Forum: 1. the public square or market place of an ancient Roman city or town, where legal and political business was conducted. 2. a law court; tribunal. 3. an assembly for the discussion of public matters or current questions.
Pontificate: 1. to officiate as a pontiff 2. to behave in the manner of a pontiff; be dogmatic
I stand by my previous post. Smiley face or no.
George, what you suggest as widely accepted means to pre-heat aren't as effective in the Arctic as they may be in Texas. The method you describe is not widely accepted, nor is it necessarily good operating practice, nor will it actually work in truly "cold" temperatures. Could you please offer the reference which suggests that this is good operating practice, please? I for one, have spent a lot of time perusing annals of arctic operations, and I've never actually seen mention of what you describe. Reference, please?
The problem with putting a heater outside the cowling is that heaters are simply designed to elevate the temperature of incoming air, and to eject warmer air. If the outside air temp is really cold, your method may not adequately heat the engine, because the heater will be drawing in really cold air and turning it into merely cool air, not actually warm enough to adequately heat the engine.
To properly heat an engine with a fan forced heater in cold, as opposed to cool, temperatures, you need to put the heater inside the cowling. This permits the air to recirculate within the cowling, and be heated and re-heated repeatedly. Do that with a fan forced heater, and you risk fire. That is a fact, though it doesn't happen bery often.
And, of course, it requires an engine blanket of some kind as well, which you noted.
If what you are doing is trying to take an engine from an ambient temperature of +20 degrees (or +15, or ???) to +50, your technique will work fine, and may in fact be a great way to pre-heat. But, what if you take the airplane on the road? You have to now carry not only the heater, the engine cover, an extension cord, and the cobbled up stovepipe, all inside the airplane.
See http://www.tanisaircraft.com for a pretty good discussion of pre-heating, which, by the way, doesn't particularly agree with your assertions either, regarding cylinder heat. Apparently, I'm not the only one.
And, it gets cold where they live, too, by the way. I'd commend anyone thinking of pre-heating to go there and read their comments. Now, understand that they sell engine heaters, so their assertions against the competition may be slanted a bit, but this is a great general discussion of pre-heating engines.
Both the Tanis and the Reiff heat systems have some engineering and testing behind them, they have no moving parts, and the likelihood of lighting your airplane on fire with one is really, really low. And, I would point out that they have tested their oil sump heat pads on engine oil pans in warm tempertures as well. Minnessota can get pretty warm in the summer. In fact, as a side note, I've flown up here in +103 degree temperatures, on floats (as in it doesn't get much worse than that), with no oil temperature problems at all, WITH an oil pan heater installed. Imagine that.
George, your original comments regarding the Tanis system are incorrect. Tanis uses a much more comprehensive approach than you let on in your post. It is a good system, and so is the Reiff system. Again, see the Tanis web site for a full description of their product. It is truly a "system".
If you live, fly and work in cold country, as I do, your method won't work. A lot of folks use fan forced heaters up here, and have good luck with them, but they put them inside the cowling, with a tightly closed cowl cover installed. Personally, I don't like the fire risk associated with these little furnaces, but they work for many many hours without trouble, and a lot of people use them, but not the way you advocate.
I prefer the installed systems, and I have a plug built into the side of my airplane (I know: MY HEAVENS!!! Stressed skin!!!). When I get somewhere with power, all I have to do is put on the engine cover, plug my extension cord into power, and into the side of the cowling of the airplane. The plug on the cowling is also equipped with a small red lamp on the outside of the cowl, so I can drive or walk by in the night and verify that the electricity is on, and the engine is getting heat. That is a comforting feeling when you are parked on the ramp in Fort Yukon for a week at a time, working in -20 or colder temperatures, or worse. I have used a Tanis pre-heat system at least once when the ambient temperature was -58. After having been plugged in all night, the engine compartment (as in all parts of it, including the firewall) was warm to the touch, and ready to go (I don't advocate flying in those temps, but that was a medevac flight, and going to warmer temps).
I have no problem with your methodology at all, for the conditions that you face, and if the only place you ever pre-heat is at home.
Now, if you have to pre-heat where there is no electricity, follow Mit Greb's suggestions in an earlier post.
Forum: 3. an assembly for the discussion of public matters or current questions.
So, for what its worth, which may not be much, especially if you live in south Florida.
Fairbanks is forecasted to hit -50 tonight, currently -36 F. No flying tomorrow.
Mike Vivion