Re: Cessna 170 Loan Issues
Posted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 2:37 am
It's certainly out of my league...but for the P-51 owners/traders of the world.... It surely is a fine airplane... but I wonder how much more desireable it'd be with it's original combat and/or maintanence records?
Another example: I once managed a flight operation (Lamar Savings) which had two King Air E-90s. One of them inherited from a subsidiary company flight dept.
It did not have all it's logbooks, but it came with a fine pedigree from Dee Howard in SAT who had spent luxurious amounts in maintaining it for a previous owner. It had incredible amounts of recent documentation from that fine company (Dee Howard) so the subsidiary flight dept. accepted the explanation of lost logs when they had purchased the airplane. (Stated to be due to failure to pay an export tax from Panama, the Panamanians had confiscated and refused to release the logs. This was a subterfuge, of course.)
Two years later, My CEO told me to sell it.
A potential buyer questioned the lack of early logs and balked at completing the sale until some more research was completed.
The history of the airplane was finally uncovered by a research company working for the buyer, who discovered a foreign gov't accident report in which that airplane serial no. had been out-of-gas and ditched in the Atlantic 8 years prior. Recovered from salt water, salvaged buy a central American salvage company, the logs were "lost" in a "central American sales-transaction" and brought to SAT for major airframe work by Dee Howard company, who insisted on a complete airframe overhaul since it was turbine equipment and FAA would not issue a U.S. airworthiness without detailed flight/cycle times unless airframe overhauled.
My employer took an incredible beating on the sale of that airplane after two full years of trying to get it sold.
But, complete logs aren't important. Naw....
Another example: I once managed a flight operation (Lamar Savings) which had two King Air E-90s. One of them inherited from a subsidiary company flight dept.
It did not have all it's logbooks, but it came with a fine pedigree from Dee Howard in SAT who had spent luxurious amounts in maintaining it for a previous owner. It had incredible amounts of recent documentation from that fine company (Dee Howard) so the subsidiary flight dept. accepted the explanation of lost logs when they had purchased the airplane. (Stated to be due to failure to pay an export tax from Panama, the Panamanians had confiscated and refused to release the logs. This was a subterfuge, of course.)
Two years later, My CEO told me to sell it.
A potential buyer questioned the lack of early logs and balked at completing the sale until some more research was completed.
The history of the airplane was finally uncovered by a research company working for the buyer, who discovered a foreign gov't accident report in which that airplane serial no. had been out-of-gas and ditched in the Atlantic 8 years prior. Recovered from salt water, salvaged buy a central American salvage company, the logs were "lost" in a "central American sales-transaction" and brought to SAT for major airframe work by Dee Howard company, who insisted on a complete airframe overhaul since it was turbine equipment and FAA would not issue a U.S. airworthiness without detailed flight/cycle times unless airframe overhauled.
My employer took an incredible beating on the sale of that airplane after two full years of trying to get it sold.
But, complete logs aren't important. Naw....