Hi to all, new guy here.
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:52 pm
Hi to all, new guy here.
Been flying most of my life and owned a few planes along the way. Got rid of our last plane a couple of years ago and have sorely missed flying. I was going to build a Fisher Dakota Hawk, have the plans sitting here next to my chair but retirement is a busy proposition and I really don't have time to build right now. We've only owned one four place airplane and that was my wife's favorite. She's the one who suggested that instead of building we buy an already flying plane and since she prefers a four seater... Well, you need to keep the missus happy, that and we have two small dogs that go everywhere with us. I can't think of a more beautiful airplane than a Cessna 170 so it looks like we'll be in the market for just the right one around the middle of the year. I'll have lots of questions between now and then so please bear with me. I want to get this right. My first question, is there much difference in flying qualities between 170's with and without dihedral? Thanks and if there are any 170 owners here in central Florida please get in touch. I'd love a ride in a 170 and I'll be more than happy to buy gas and lunch. Louie
Louie Hanna ‘49 A model
- Bruce Fenstermacher
- Posts: 10418
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am
Re: Hi to all, new guy here.
To answer your specific question, no, 99 out of 100 pilots wouldn't be able to tell the difference dihedral makes.Aeroplane wrote: My first question, is there much difference in flying qualities between 170's with and without dihedral?
Now if you asked, is there a difference between the 170s with dihedral and those without, the answer is yes there is. The single biggest thing people think is the important difference is those with dihedral have the larger semi Fowler flaps and those without have smaller flaps. But in reality for most average pilots who are not trying to push the envelope as a bush pilot the flaps aren't important at all.
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
- GAHorn
- Posts: 21290
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm
Re: Hi to all, new guy here.
The difference between those with and those without dihedral is small...but noticeable in turbulence. That's why Cessna changed the design despite the increased cost of doing so (in an "economy" airplane.)
Is it a "deal breaker" if the airplane considered doesn't have it but otherwise is a happy choice? No. The high-wing design already has inherent stability. Dihedral only improves it a bit.
There is so much with which to be more concerned than dihedral when choosing among 170 models. Things like: Condition/Condition/Condition ...followed by Documentation/Documentation/Documentation...
And color. (Red is best.)
Is it a "deal breaker" if the airplane considered doesn't have it but otherwise is a happy choice? No. The high-wing design already has inherent stability. Dihedral only improves it a bit.
There is so much with which to be more concerned than dihedral when choosing among 170 models. Things like: Condition/Condition/Condition ...followed by Documentation/Documentation/Documentation...
And color. (Red is best.)

'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons.

- blueldr
- Posts: 4442
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am
Re: Hi to all, new guy here.
How much experience do you have flying airplanes with conventional landing gear configuration? (Tailwheels)
If your previous experience was exclusively or primarily in airplanes with a nose wheel, If I were you I would seriously consider a
C-172. They're almost the same airplane, are cheaper to buy and insure and you wont have to relearn to fly. If you have a burning desire to be a REAL piliot, good luck finding a real pilots airplane.
If your previous experience was exclusively or primarily in airplanes with a nose wheel, If I were you I would seriously consider a
C-172. They're almost the same airplane, are cheaper to buy and insure and you wont have to relearn to fly. If you have a burning desire to be a REAL piliot, good luck finding a real pilots airplane.
BL
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:52 pm
Re: Hi to all, new guy here.
Thanks to all for the good advice so far, keep it coming. We won't be ready to "pull the pin" as they say till somewhere around June or July according to the office of management and budget (wifey). Never flown a taildragger before but I've got lots of friends down at my airport (COI) who are willing and anxious to help with that. Cant't be much tougher than than setting auger cast piling with a very old 70 ton American crawler!
Louie Hanna ‘49 A model
- edbooth
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Wed Nov 24, 2004 3:03 am
Re: Hi to all, new guy here.
The taildraggers are really not that tough if you remember to keep your legs moving and don't stop flying it until the wheels are chocked.... Welcome to the club, ya can't go wrong with this bunch.Aeroplane wrote:Thanks to all for the good advice so far, keep it coming. We won't be ready to "pull the pin" as they say till somewhere around June or July according to the office of management and budget (wifey). Never flown a taildragger before but I've got lots of friends down at my airport (COI) who are willing and anxious to help with that. Cant't be much tougher than than setting auger cast piling with a very old 70 ton American crawler!
Ed Booth, 170-B and RV-7 Driver
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 4:30 am
Re: Hi to all, new guy here.
When I bought my 120 I had zero taildragger time. Don't let that scare you away from buying one....everyone has to start somewhere. My experience with the 170 so far has been that she is a really honest, easy to fly plane. If I were teaching someone to fly tailwheel it would be in the 170, not the 120. Good luck, and welcome!!
- 170C
- Posts: 3182
- Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 11:59 am
Re: Hi to all, new guy here.
Welcome Louie! Glad to have you aboard. There are quite a few 170 members there in Florida and I am sure you could get an introductory flight with them. If you haven't flown a tail wheeled plane before, you will learn what the rudder pedals are for pretty quickly. You will learn how to fly the plane on take off & landing rather than driving it. As my old instructor told me, it will make a better pilot out of you! You will find the 170 to be a delight and a lot of fun. Good luck with your hunt and please feel free to ask as many questions as you wish. You will get lots of feedback from this group. Now don't pay too much attention to George when it comes to the proper color of plane to get
Red works well, but the GREEN ones just go a little faster




OLE POKEY
170C
Director:
2012-2018
170C
Director:
2012-2018
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:52 pm
Re: Hi to all, new guy here.
Thanks again for all the input. Can't wait for the summer when we can start our search in earnest. Meanwhile I'm checking Barnstormers daily and if a deal were to come up sooner we might jump. Happy New Year guys!
Louie Hanna ‘49 A model
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.