Blueldr, one thing you left out about training in tailwheel airplanes back in WWII and before... they did indeed train those thousands of pilots in tailwheel airplanes, they also wrecked thousands of tailwheel airplanes!
Things have indeed changed! As an example...I recently read where the accident rate for carrier jets in 1956 was 76 per 100,000 flight hours flown, in 2000 it was 0.71 per 100,000 flight hours. That is a 100 fold reduction! (I know this has nothing to do with nosewhel vs. tailwheel, but it is a good statistic to impress the ladies with!

)
It wasn't that unusual for someone to wreck an airplane and then jump right back into another. Even the "great" Lindberg went through a few airplanes.
Now days most of us have to worry about insurance and the cost of repairs (parts have gone up in price exponentially), not to mention that there are few shops that will take on a rebuild after an accident. Unfortunately the insurance companies don't make up the accident statistics on airplanes, we do - and unfortunately taildraggers lead the way in landing accidents.
The owner of a local flight school was hinting to me about how he would like to get a tailwheel airplane for training, I can tell you, there is no way in hell I would put mine on the flight line, I would only give it a month or two before it it would get rolled up into a ball! I would recommend initially flying an airplane with the training wheel up front (a flight school's),then transitioning with an experienced instructor, why accept more risk on your shoulders?
(I am putting in lots of emoticons because I don't mean this as an attack on past training (in what was mostly a worldwide emergency), nor am I attacking our great little taildraggers.

:
Fly safe!
David