Installing Gap Seals. Pro/Cons
Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Fri Oct 03, 2003 2:48 am
Installing Gap Seals. Pro/Cons
I've enjoyed the comments on the various subjects since I aquired my 55 "B" model in April. I've since installed a windshield, headliner, "push tube", brake disks, avionics, and new paint, with lots of help from reading these subjects on the Forum. You guys are doing a great job. I haven't seen much regarding installing Gap Seals on the flaps and/or ailerons. I've installed them on a previously owned Skylane, and would appreciate comments relative to installation on the 170.
- GAHorn
- Posts: 21277
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm
While I'm not a fan of gap seals, (how would you ever get your money back on this item?) ... I would like to have answered why flap gap seals are "bad" and hurt flap performance? They only seal the gap while the flaps are fully up, right? So Fowler flaps,...or even semi-fowler flaps,... or even slotted semi-Fowler flaps like we have on our 170B's shouldn't be hurt (performance wise) by gap seals, should they?
-
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2002 7:24 pm
The way I understand it, the aileron gap seals can indeed improve the
effectiveness of the ailerons by nature of the design (split hinge at the
upper surface of the wing). The effectiveness of a slotted Fowler flap
design however depends considerably upon air passing through the "slot"
as-it-were, and anything you install that blocks (to any extent) this path
of air starts to defeat the inherint characteristics/benefits of the
fowler flap design.
As far as getting you money back, I'm not so sure I'd reach into my
wallet to buy a set of aileron gap seals for my '54 if they weren't
already on the airplane when I bought it.... I flew a bone-stock '53 for
awhile and quite frankly, didn't notice a great deal of difference.... I
think the aileron rigging (cable tension, etc.) between airplanes would,
in itself, tend to make pilots think one airpalne (vs another) had "more effective" ailerons.
Bela P. Havasreti
'54 C-170B N170BP
effectiveness of the ailerons by nature of the design (split hinge at the
upper surface of the wing). The effectiveness of a slotted Fowler flap
design however depends considerably upon air passing through the "slot"
as-it-were, and anything you install that blocks (to any extent) this path
of air starts to defeat the inherint characteristics/benefits of the
fowler flap design.
As far as getting you money back, I'm not so sure I'd reach into my
wallet to buy a set of aileron gap seals for my '54 if they weren't
already on the airplane when I bought it.... I flew a bone-stock '53 for
awhile and quite frankly, didn't notice a great deal of difference.... I
think the aileron rigging (cable tension, etc.) between airplanes would,
in itself, tend to make pilots think one airpalne (vs another) had "more effective" ailerons.
Bela P. Havasreti
'54 C-170B N170BP
- Roesbery
- Posts: 302
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 4:34 am
- GAHorn
- Posts: 21277
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm
Well, Joe, that ain't necessarily so. The B-model wing also has lots of available lift/drag from those large flaps, and improved aileron effectiveness from outer wing-panel twist, and stability-enhancing dihedral. Not many of the A model wings have that Vne twist-and-dihedral mod yours has.N1478D wrote:Why not just go ahead and put A model wings on instead. With the gap seals on, that's what you end up with on the bottom of the wing anyway.

- N1478D
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:32 pm



Joe
51 C170A
Grand Prairie, TX
51 C170A
Grand Prairie, TX
- GAHorn
- Posts: 21277
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm
- N1478D
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon Apr 22, 2002 5:32 pm
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.