Sample ElectLoad.JPG
Lopez, only for the purpose of clarifying the private msgs which we shared......that appears to be a publication-article...not a resource. (Authored by "El Capitan"?)
It is only an illustration of what types of loads might meet the definition of continuous versus intermittent. (I don't believe it's a regulatory document. Where did you source it?)
Also, as I mentioned in our private msgs,
as a practical matter (if not a legal one) .... "cigarette lighters" fail to meet their "Intermittent" status when continuously used for power-supplies for "portable equipment".
The table provided may have other serious flaws. For example, the heater blower motor included in the intermittent table, might quickly drain a system which did not provide for it's more-likely continuous useage. And the ratings/loads may not be representative...for example, the (4) nav lites do not specify make/model/brand or actual lamps, etc..
(And since when do light single engine aircraft have FOUR wingtip nav lights? And where does that table account for anti-collision-lighting? Even if the FOUR wingtip lights were to include strobes....it would be incorrect. Either they aren't wingtip....or they aren't FOUR and still meet FAR requirements.)
Anyway, the private correspondence we enjoyed seemed to indicate you were searching for an "official" statement by FAA that landing/taxi lights were not continuous loads. I don't think the article posted meets that definition.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.