Landing/taxi lights are not a continuous load???

How to keep the Cessna 170 flying and airworthy.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
Lopez
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:25 pm

Landing/taxi lights are not a continuous load???

Post by Lopez »

I'm doing an electrical load analysis for a field approval I am working on. I've read many posts on many forums alluding to the idea that landing/taxi lights are an "intermittent load" but I can't seem to find an FAA reference to that. Does anyone know where the FAA says that specifically or something contrary.

FWIW, my 185 service manual includes a list of electrical items and there current draw, and there is a separate section labeled "Items not considered part of running load", and in that list are the landing lights. With that in mind, I'm inclined to believe the tribal knowledge. If Cessna did it, it has a shot at being legal, right? :lol:
User avatar
canav8
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:34 pm

Re: Landing/taxi lights are not a continuous load???

Post by canav8 »

Lopez it is in 43.13 electrical. Chapter 11, section -36 Determining Electrical Load
52' C-170B N2713D Ser #25255
Doug
Lopez
Posts: 177
Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2007 4:25 pm

Re: Landing/taxi lights are not a continuous load???

Post by Lopez »

HOLY COW I FOUND IT!!! Actually a little help from the BCP board got me there. The FAA's Airplane Flying Handbook, figure 16-9 attached...
Figure 16-9.pdf
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21260
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Landing/taxi lights are not a continuous load???

Post by GAHorn »

Sample ElectLoad.JPG
Lopez, only for the purpose of clarifying the private msgs which we shared......that appears to be a publication-article...not a resource. (Authored by "El Capitan"?)
It is only an illustration of what types of loads might meet the definition of continuous versus intermittent. (I don't believe it's a regulatory document. Where did you source it?)

Also, as I mentioned in our private msgs, as a practical matter (if not a legal one) .... "cigarette lighters" fail to meet their "Intermittent" status when continuously used for power-supplies for "portable equipment".

The table provided may have other serious flaws. For example, the heater blower motor included in the intermittent table, might quickly drain a system which did not provide for it's more-likely continuous useage. And the ratings/loads may not be representative...for example, the (4) nav lites do not specify make/model/brand or actual lamps, etc..

(And since when do light single engine aircraft have FOUR wingtip nav lights? And where does that table account for anti-collision-lighting? Even if the FOUR wingtip lights were to include strobes....it would be incorrect. Either they aren't wingtip....or they aren't FOUR and still meet FAR requirements.)

Anyway, the private correspondence we enjoyed seemed to indicate you were searching for an "official" statement by FAA that landing/taxi lights were not continuous loads. I don't think the article posted meets that definition.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
User avatar
n2582d
Posts: 2997
Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2002 4:58 am

Re: Landing/taxi lights are not a continuous load???

Post by n2582d »

It seems the FAA definition of what is a continuous or intermittent load has been a bit elusive. I think I’ve found it. First, we find that the FAA has let the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) make the rules in this regard. Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 48
The FAA finds the following new consensus standard acceptable for normal ... category airplanes. The consensus standard listed below may be used unless the FAA publishes a specific notification otherwise.
a. ASTM Designation F 2490–05, titled: Standard Guide for Aircraft Electrical Load and Power Source Capacity Analysis.
So then we look at ASTM Designation F 2490–05. In paragraph 6.4.1.7 they divide operating time into three categories:
Operating Times.png
The 5 second analysis would be considered momentary -- like discharging your parachute flares. The loads between 5 seconds and 5 minutes are considered intermittent -- dome light perhaps -- and finally, loads on longer than 5 minutes are considered continuous.

So how did the landing and taxi lights get the "intermittent" classification? The general rule/advice is to have them on within 10 miles of the airport and below 10,000' -- hardly less than five minutes. When our aircraft were built this was not the general rule. In 1973 the FAA came up with the "Operation Lights On" program as a collision avoidance strategy. I think this is when landing/taxi lights went from being intermittent loads to continuous loads -- in practice if not on paper. It looks like Cessna tried to strike a middle ground on this program by suggesting only using the taxi light as an anti-collision light when they issued SNL85-35.
Landing lights on.pdf
So Landing Light = Intermittent load, Taxi Light = Continuous load? Tough to do with one switch for both lights.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Gary
Post Reply
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.