Cessna 170 differences

A place to relax and discuss flying topics.

Moderators: GAHorn, Karl Towle, Bruce Fenstermacher

Post Reply
grumman41
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 11:42 am

Cessna 170 differences

Post by grumman41 »

I'm currently a Cessna 120 owner and thinking about moving into a C-170. I know some of the differences of the 170, 170A and 170B. I would like to hear some specifics concerning powerplants they came with, fuel capacity, useful load and general things that makes an airplane desirable to own and operate.

On a personal note I don't mind the fabric wing if it came from the factory with it but never been a big fan of metalized wings. It seems like a bast@$#%erdiztion of a great vintage aircraft. My 120 has the fabric wing and performs terrific but it seems in the 170's most pilots prefer the 170B.

I look forward to hearing your input....love the C-120 but never flew the 170! Fuel burn in the 145HP engine would be nice to know.

Thanks, Kevin
User avatar
canav8
Posts: 1006
Joined: Thu Sep 25, 2008 2:34 pm

Re: Cessna 170 differences

Post by canav8 »

Kevin, where are you located? Maybe one of our association members can give you a ride!
52' C-170B N2713D Ser #25255
Doug
User avatar
170C
Posts: 3182
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 11:59 am

Re: Cessna 170 differences

Post by 170C »

The best means of seeing all the differences between the 170 models is to get on of the 170 books. There is a wealth of information in that book and they are readily available from headquarters and at a very reasonable price. Anyone considering the purchase of a 170 or anyone currently owning a 170 should have one of these MUST HAVE books.
OLE POKEY
170C
Director:
2012-2018
bigrenna
Posts: 525
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:23 pm

delete

Post by bigrenna »

delete
Last edited by bigrenna on Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Bruce Fenstermacher
Posts: 10418
Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2002 11:24 am

Re: Cessna 170 differences

Post by Bruce Fenstermacher »

As noted all the power plants were C-145 or 0-300-A. They are the same engine. There was is an undampened crank version of the C-145 but nothing really to be concerned if you happen on one. They didn't come with 0-300-B, C or D engines though you will find plenty of them installed. No real improvement of any kind, same engine with a different prop flange. Make sure the installation is legal.

The 48 will be most like the 140 in fact it shares a few of the parts. The A and B models were just natural progression of so called improvements. B models have more in common with later 172s as the wing is the same and so more parts are more readily available.

48s tend to be less loaded with equipment and therefor lighter and many think they fly the best. Lots of folks don't like the roll response of the 48. Many like the B model because they feel they need the big semi fowler flaps. Lots of folks think they need the 53 and later stiffer gear. But just as many think the early gear is just fine and they can go anywhere a B model with the big flaps can.

All this is very much like the Cessna 120/140 line. I'm sure there are some who wouldn't bother with less than a 140A the others want a 120.

All of the models of 170 will burn about the same gas, between 7 and 9 gal an hour and all with lift about the same weight with useful loads between 800-875.

As stated condition should be your number one concern not model. And as stated there is a lot of information here.

The easiest for us is for you to read and study a bit then ask specific questions.

One thing for sure though GREEN examples ARE faster than RED. There is a few on here who will try to tell you different. :)
CAUTION - My forum posts may be worth what you paid for them!

Bruce Fenstermacher, Past President, TIC170A
Email: brucefenster at gmail.com
User avatar
blueldr
Posts: 4442
Joined: Thu May 02, 2002 3:16 am

Re: Cessna 170 differences

Post by blueldr »

Over the years that I owned and operated three different "B" models, I averaged about 7.2 gph fuel burn with a mid altitude, 5k to 9k MSL, TAS of 112 to 115 MPH. By preference, I almost always operated on Mogas when and where available.
BL
User avatar
GAHorn
Posts: 21290
Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2002 8:45 pm

Re: Cessna 170 differences

Post by GAHorn »

grumman41 wrote:I'm currently a Cessna 120 owner and thinking about moving into a C-170. I know some of the differences of the 170, 170A and 170B. I would like to hear some specifics concerning powerplants they came with, fuel capacity, useful load and general things that makes an airplane desirable to own and operate.

On a personal note I don't mind the fabric wing if it came from the factory with it but never been a big fan of metalized wings. It seems like a bast@$#%erdiztion of a great vintage aircraft. My 120 has the fabric wing and performs terrific but it seems in the 170's most pilots prefer the 170B.

I look forward to hearing your input....love the C-120 but never flew the 170! Fuel burn in the 145HP engine would be nice to know.

Thanks, Kevin
WELCOME to our sweet little group, Kevin.
But you do need to do your homework before blasting-in asking questions that have been addressed so VERY OBVIOUSLY well. Read the opening post of THIS FORUM: http://www.cessna170.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=228

Then be brave ...and ask anything else you'd like to ask, becasue we LOVE the 170 and also anyone else who is interested in them! :P
'53 B-model N146YS SN:25713
50th Anniversary of Flight Model. Winner-Best Original 170B, 100th Anniversary of Flight Convention.
An originality nut (mostly) for the right reasons. ;)
Post Reply
Cessna® is a registered trademark of Textron Aviation, Inc. The International Cessna® 170 Association is an independent owners/operators association dedicated to C170 aircraft and early O-300-powered C172s. We are not affiliated with Cessna® or Textron Aviation, Inc. in any way.