This post regards the nut at the inboard gear leg attachment as shown here. Here is a table outlining the bolts and nuts used on various Cessna taildraggers: Here is a screenshot from the Military Standard Spec sheet for the MS20365 nut which is identical to, and interchangeable with, the AN365 nut. I've always equated the ubiquitous AN365 nut to be one with the nylon insert as shown here. This is not necessarily true; if the AN365 nut has a "C" suffix it doesn't denote that it is a stainless nut with a fiber or nylon insert. It means that it is all metal, i.e. there is no nylon or fiber insert. But, if the spec sheet is correct, without the "A" or the "C" suffix it could be either one. So, looking at the table, did Cessna use all steel nuts or nuts with fiber inserts on the C-170 and C-17OA? Looking at the numerical index in the IPC's of all three 170 models there is no "A" on any AN365 nut listed. My guess (without any proof) is that there must have been a different standard when Cessna listed these nuts. It seems to me that Cessna equates AN365-XXX nuts without any suffix to be the same as AN365-XXXA.cessnut wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2025 6:33 pm Not to beat a dead horse here, but according to my understanding an MS21044N nut is not a replacement for an AN 365-720C. It is a replacement for an AN 365-720. The bottom line is that the NTSB missed the fact that Cessna calls for an all metal locknut. Any Nylon nut, corrosion resistant or otherwise, would not be an approved substitute. Textron also gets this wrong since they superseded both AN 365-720 and AN 365-720C to an MS21044N.
In their Q&A section of this nut it seems to me that Aircraft Spruce has got its facts wrong as they write
and againQ: I would like to know the difference between: AN365C-1032 and AN365-1032C
These are both the same as the "C" represents that they are stainless steel.
Q: What is the difference between a AN365-428C and an AN365-428A?
The C designates stainless steel. The A will be cad plated steel.